- All Journals
- Al-Qadisiyah University
- Basrah University
- Kirkuk University
- Mosul University
- The Iraqi Borad for Medical Specialization
- University of Anbar
- University of Technology
- Al Mustafa University
- Al-Zahraa University for Women
- Alnoor University
- Kunooz University
- Misan University
- Ninevah University
- Tikrit University
- University of Al-Hamdaniya
- University of Kerbala
ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT FOR DIYALA UNIVERSITY PROJECTS USING THE METHOD OF MULTIPLE CRITERIA COMPLEX PROPORTIONAL ASSESSMENT (COPRAS) | ||
| DIYALA JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES | ||
| Article 3, Volume 5, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 10-29 PDF (0 K) | ||
| Author | ||
| Hafeth I. Naji | ||
| Abstract | ||
| The critical competition between firms in the construction market is the challenge in marketing its products, so these companies started search for the best talent Used better management tools and new ways to respond to this challenge, and the quality management represents one of these management tools in the construction industry. This research aims to highlight the importance of quality, and how it can be employed technical grounds (COPRAS) in the assessment of quality management for Diyala University projects, through the identification of the criteria used to select the best project in terms of quality management, as well as determining the list of Diyala University projects in order to choose the optimal project of these terms. For the purpose of achieving the objective of research, has been collecting its own data from the literature that addressed the objective of quality management and method of multiple criteria complex proportional assessment (COPRAS), and finally personal interviews of qualified designers and implementers and operators of these projects. the results of data analysis for the sample and then Rank Order Centroid method (ROC) and distinctive in their application Showed that criteria of the design, control on the costs and changes in work, review contracts, and control on the functions of the project are the most important criteria for bilateral comparisons between projects, and that the criteria of design, and control on the cost and changes in work are more important than the rest of the criteria in the projects. Finally, and by calculating the relative importance , priorities of the alternatives and the benefit degree of the projects, we find that students club Project has received the largest share of the benefit and importance compared with other projects. In the end, was a set of conclusions and recommendations of the various aspects of the topic from, accelerate the application of techniques of decision-making multi-criteria in the evaluation of projects in addition to expediting the application of the systems proposed by researchers for the quality management to help the engineers on the best implementation of this administration. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| quality management; COPR | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 178 PDF Download: 46 |
||