- All Journals
- Al-Qadisiyah University
- Basrah University
- Kirkuk University
- Mosul University
- The Iraqi Borad for Medical Specialization
- University of Anbar
- University of Technology
- Al Mustafa University
- Al-Zahraa University for Women
- Alnoor University
- Kunooz University
- Misan University
- Ninevah University
- Tikrit University
- University of Al-Hamdaniya
- University of Kerbala
Lexical Trench Mark and its Impact on Guiding Content (Ocean-Sea Explication as a Model) | ||
| AL-AMEED JOURNAL | ||
| Article 1, Volume 2, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 279-319 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Ahamed Khudheir; ; Abass Al | ||
| Abstract | ||
| The three language systems i.e. Phonetics, grammar and syntax produce many contexts help in understanding and determine meaning. This study states that lexicon has its own system where the content of the meant system has many relations ; a given word, in the mind of the lexicographer or the native speaker, is linked to a semantic field and a set of relations as well…and this is the basis on which the lexical fields ,semantic fields, are based. This lexical system determines the context of lexical meaning, lexical context; Lexical meaning doesn’t mean that it is irrelative to the relations it has with other linguistic vocabulary. Such a deep-rooted denotation, in the mind of the native speaker ,should be used for founding the written text and coining speech and in text analysis as well so that the lexical meaning will be the context required in this regard. This runs counter to what may be understood that such a context is an extra one in that it is rather using the lexical meaning outside the context and its connections just to understand the text in a given context . This type of context has a great effect in determining the accordance and semantic harmony among sentence constituents in the context. This can be seen clearly in states of lexical collocations which represent the lexical aspect of grammatical collocations. This study is of many parts to indicate the effect of the mentioned context ; the parsing might depend on lexical meaning, i.e. however you direct the meaning, parsing is directed as well. The grammatical rule is linked to the lexical meaning whose validity reckons upon it , if conditioned to have a specific meaning. In addition, a lexical meaning might lead to a functional one ; grammatical or syntactic. It might happen that a lexical cohesion is found among the vocabulary of a text which leads to clarification and understanding of meaning by a receptor, or there might be a lexical paradox among those vocabularies. Such a paradox is divided into two types: a close paradox where the two words have an symmetrical relation as that of metaphor which leads to a state of interpretation or explanation. The second one is the distant paradox where there is no a relation or link among the words in paradox that leads to deletion of meaning or turning the text into mere nonsense. The latter type is excluded from the study since its application leads to the explanation of the Glorious Quran. Inclusion adds a lexical meaning to words since it expands the lexical denotation of a word and it has a rhetorical précis as acknowledged by Abu Hayyan. It also has a strong link with paradox for it represents one of the ways used as an escape in interpretation. This may be due to structural paradox which means structure in surface that is incorrect or different from the grammatical rule , then we need to interpret it. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 182 PDF Download: 93 |
||