- All Journals
- Al-Qadisiyah University
- Basrah University
- Kirkuk University
- Mosul University
- The Iraqi Borad for Medical Specialization
- University of Anbar
- University of Technology
- Al Mustafa University
- Al-Zahraa University for Women
- Alnoor University
- Kunooz University
- Misan University
- Ninevah University
- Tikrit University
- University of Al-Hamdaniya
- University of Kerbala
Provisions of the omission in the responsibility for the act Profile | ||
| journal of legal sciences | ||
| Article 1, Volume 30, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 1-52 | ||
| Author | ||
| muthana muhammed | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Have an active responsibility for the damage his fault if the right mistaken harm to others, which is to be fabricated and unkept law, which defines b (positive error). So when the damage occurred has responsibility mistaken. There is no difference here between civil or minus Adimha or entirety, all of the damage to the right actor to others bear responsibility for the damage done. But it's not same applies to the negative line, will apply the rules of the positive error in the case of damage as a result of a negative error? In other words, do you assume an active damage Almsazulah passive wrong? Here fall form of negative or error, namely, (omission), a case in which the individual shall not take action in time, which imposes the law sometimes do work. Or imposes a duty upon to do a certain job. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Provisions of the omission in the responsibility for the act Profile | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 179 PDF Download: 32 |
||