Evaluating the Adhesive Properties of Four Types of Conventional Adhesives

Mosa, Muhanad H.; Hamzah, Mohsin N.

doi:10.30684/etj.v40i1.2137

	Evaluating the Adhesive Properties of Four Types of Conventional Adhesives
Engineering and Technology Journal
Article 14, Volume 40, Issue 1, 2022, Pages 120-128 PDF (1.1 M)
DOI: 10.30684/etj.v40i1.2137
Authors
Muhanad H. Mosa^* ; Mohsin N. Hamzah
Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Al-Qadisiyah, Al-Qadisiyah, Iraq.
Abstract
The development of manufacturing technology led to the appearance of various products that need effective types of adhesives with good strength and durability in different types of joints. Accordingly, the issue is how to choose the appropriate adhesive for the specific application relying on the properties of adhesive besides, the work conditions. This work deals with the experimental testing of four types of an adhesives that have been prepared to test by the two types of joints to comprehend the behavior of adhesives then choose the most effective and optimum type. The Butt and single lap joint tests were achieved according to the ASTM standard D2095–96 and D-1002-99 respectively. The adhesives that were used were epoxy Resins, MS Hybrid Polymers, Polyvinylester, and R.T.V Silicon Rubber, also, used a steel material as adherents. The study concluded important points about these adhesives and the recommendation suggested essential points to select satiable adhesive.
Highlights
The butt and single lap joint are the powerful techniques to evaluate the adhesives. Quasi-static loads have been used effectively to find the response of adhesives. MS Hybrid Polymers can employ in applications that have strength with flexibility. MS Hybrid Polymers has the cohesive failure in both the normal and shear forces.
Keywords
Butt-Joint Single lap-Joint Epoxy Resins; MS Hybrid Polymers Polyvinylester R.T.V Silicon Rubber

References
[1] H. Sano, T. Shono, H. Sonoda, and T. Takatsu, Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength—evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test, Dental Materials, 10 (1994) 236-240. [2] T. Yokoyama, Experimental determination of impact tensile properties of adhesive butt joints with the split Hopkinson bar, The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design, 38 (2003) 233-245. [3] S. Yildiz, Y. Andreopoulos, F. Delale, and A. Smail, Adhesively bonded joints under quasi-static and shock-wave loadings, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 143 (2020) 103613. [4] L. F. Da Silva, T. Rodrigues, M. Figueiredo, M. De Moura, and J. Chousal, Effect of adhesive type and thickness on the lap shear strength, The Journal of adhesion, 82 (2006) 1091-1115. [5] S. Hayashida, T. Sugaya, S. Kuramoto, and C. Sato, Impact strength of joints bonded with high-strength pressure-sensitive adhesive, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 56 (2015) 61-72. [6] L. Goglio, L. Peroni, M. Peroni, and M. Rossetto, High strain-rate compression and tension behaviour of an epoxy bi-component adhesive, International journal of adhesion and adhesives, 28 (2008) 329-339. [7] M. Banea, M. da Silva, and R. Campilho, The effect of adhesive thickness on the mechanical behavior of a structural polyurethane adhesive, The Journal of Adhesion, 91 (2015) 331-346. [8] R. D. Campilho, Natural fiber composites. Taylor & Francis Group, 1 st ed, London 2015. [9] B. Blackman, A. Kinloch, A. Taylor, and Y. Wang, The impact wedge-peel performance of structural adhesives, Journal of materials science, 35 (2000) 1867-1884. [10] A. Guilpin, G. Franciere, L. Barton, M. Blacklock, and M. Birkett, A Numerical and experimental study of adhesively-bonded polyethylene pipelines, Polymers, 11 (2019) 1531. [11] T. Kalina, F. Sedlacek, and J. Krystek, Determination of the influence of adherent surface on the adhesive bond strength, in Matec Web of Conferences, France, (2018) 5012. [12] R. Adams and J. Harris, A critical assessment of the block impact test for measuring the impact strength of adhesive bonds, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 16 (1996) 61-71. [13] L. Goglio and M. Rossetto, Impact rupture of structural adhesive joints under different stress combinations, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 35 (2008) 635-643. [14] F. Kadioglu and R. D. Adams, Flexible adhesives for automotive application under impact loading, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 56 (2015) 73-78. [15] M. Dziaduszewska, M. Wekwejt, M. Bartmański, A. Pałubicka, G. Gajowiec, T. Seramak, A. M. Osyczka, and A. Zieliński, The effect of surface modification of Ti13Zr13Nb alloy on adhesion of antibiotic and nanosilver-loaded bone cement coatings dedicated for application as spacers, Materials, 12 (2019) 2964. [16] R. Breto, A. Chiminelli, E. Duvivier, M. Lizaranzu, and M. Jiménez, Finite element analysis of functionally graded bond-lines for metal/composite joints, The Journal of Adhesion, 91 (2015) 920-936. [17] A. S. Pramono and A. B. Hudayya, Non-Monotonous Effect of Adhesive Thickness on The Dynamic Stiffness of Adhesive Butt Joint, Key Engineering Materials, 867 (2020) 88-195. [18] R. Tai and S. Szklarska, Effect of fillers on the degradation of automotive epoxy adhesives in aqueous solutions, Journal of Materials Science, 28 (1993) 6205-6210. [19] R. Kahraman and M. Al-Harthi, Moisture diffusion into aluminum powder-filled epoxy adhesive in sodium chloride solutions, International ournal of adhesion, 25 (2005) 337-341. [20] R. Aradhana, S. Mohanty, and S. K. Nayak, A review on epoxy-based electrically conductive adhesives, International Journal of Adhesion, 99 (2020) 102596. [21] L. F. Da Silva, A. Öchsner, and R. D. Adams, Handbook of adhesion technology, Springer Science & Business Media, 1st ed, Berlin, 2011. [22] I. ABRO, Epoxy Data sheet, Technical Data Sheet, 2020. [23] C. Soudal, The benefits of MS Hybrid Polymer adhesives, Data Sheet, 2016. [24] U. Gmbh and C. Kodn, Technical documentation of UHU The all purpose adhesive, Data Sheet, 2021. [25] B. Parkland, RTV Silicone Adhesive Sealant, Technical Data Sheet-, 2009. [26] L. Grant, R. D. Adams, and L. F. da Silva, Experimental and numerical analysis of single-lap joints for the automotive industry, International Journal of adhesion and adhesives, 29 (2009) 405-413. [27] ASTM-standerd, Standard Test Method for Tensile Strength of Adhesives by Means of Bar and Rod Specimens, ASTM International, 2002. [28] L. F. Da Silva, R. Carbas, G. W. Critchlow, M. Figueiredo, and K. Brown, Effect of material, geometry, surface treatment and environment on the shear strength of single lap joints, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 29 (2009) 621-632. [29] ASTM-Standard, Test Method- Apparent Shear Strenght of Single-Lap- joint Adhesively Bonded Metal Specimen by Tension Loading (Metal-to-Metal), ASTM International, 2006. [30] O. Tinius, Universal Testing Machine, Data Sheet, 2020. [31] S. G. Prolongo, G. del Rosario, and A. Ureña, Comparative study on the adhesive properties of different epoxy resins, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 26 (2006) 125-132. [32] K. Bouzakis, I. Tsiafis, N. Michailidis, and A. Tsouknidas, Determination of Epoxy Resin’s mechanical properties by experimental-computational procedures in tension, in Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Manufacturing Engineering (ICMEN), UK (2008) 1-3. [33] Ž. Unuk, A. Ivanič, V. Ž. Leskovar, M. Premrov, and S. Lubej, Evaluation of a structural epoxy adhesive for timber-glass bonds under shear loading and different environmental conditions, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 95 (2019) 102425. [34] E. M. Petrie, MS Polymers in Hybrid Sealants, EMP Solutions, 2 (2010). [35] S. H. Triyono and S. S. Neng, Shear Strength of the Mixed Adhesive Joint Silyl Modified Polymer-Epoxy in Single Lap Joint Aluminum Triyono/Sri Hastuti and Neng Sri Suharty, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, (2017) 235-248.
Statistics Article View: 340 PDF Download: 430