Al-Saedi, A., Abed, F., Alwan, I. (2024). Tank deformation analysis by combining laser scanning and photogrammetry. , 42(11), 1417-1434. doi: 10.30684/etj.2024.153203.1810
Ali Salah J. Al-Saedi; Fanar M. Abed; Imzahim A. Alwan. "Tank deformation analysis by combining laser scanning and photogrammetry". , 42, 11, 2024, 1417-1434. doi: 10.30684/etj.2024.153203.1810
Al-Saedi, A., Abed, F., Alwan, I. (2024). 'Tank deformation analysis by combining laser scanning and photogrammetry', , 42(11), pp. 1417-1434. doi: 10.30684/etj.2024.153203.1810
Al-Saedi, A., Abed, F., Alwan, I. Tank deformation analysis by combining laser scanning and photogrammetry. , 2024; 42(11): 1417-1434. doi: 10.30684/etj.2024.153203.1810

Tank deformation analysis by combining laser scanning and photogrammetry

Engineering and Technology Journal
Volume 42, Issue 11, November 2024, Pages 1417-1434    PDF (6.06 M)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.30684/etj.2024.153203.1810
Authors
Ali Salah J. Al-Saedi* 1; Fanar M. Abed2; Imzahim A. Alwan3
1Surveying Department, Amara Technical Institute, Southern Technical University, Misan, Iraq. Civil Engineering Dept., University of Technology-Iraq, Alsina’a street, 10066 Baghdad, Iraq.
2Surveying Engineering Dept., College of Engineering, University of Baghdad, Jadriya, Baghdad, Iraq.
3Civil Engineering Dept., University of Technology-Iraq, Alsina’a street, 10066 Baghdad, Iraq.
Abstract
Laser scanning systems are used to capture high-resolution 3D point clouds, thereby obtaining the object geometry. Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) technology is an essential data capture tool for providing high-quality point clouds for industrial environments. However, TLS point clouds can be lacking and incomplete due to occlusions prevalent in complicated industrial environments. The static nature of the system makes it necessary to use a complementary data collection technique, such as cameras, to fill the gaps, enrich density, and improve data quality. Therefore, in this research, an integrated work frame was presented that would allow for the automatic and reliable direct co-registration of TLS data and photogrammetry of industrial objects. Combining TLS data and photogrammetric-derived SfM-MVS techniques makes getting a comprehensive dataset of complex objects possible. This is accomplished by employing individual approaches in situations that provide the most favorable conditions for operation. This research aims to detect deformation and determine the geometric features of oil plant equipment (tanks) in industrial sites. This was achieved by integrating TLS and UAV photogrammetry measurements of an oil plant in Basra City, Iraq. The gaps in the point cloud coverage introduced by TLS and UAV individual measurements are eliminated following the integration process. Detailed comparison analyses are performed on cross-sections, and the results are analyzed to show potential found to comply within a few millimeters. After data integration and accuracy analysis, the RMSE was withdrawn to reach 3 cm. This research approves the potential of data fusion to detect deformations in industrial sites.

Highlights
  • Integrating terrestrial laser scanning and photogrammetry enhanced data quality, comprehension, and interpretation.
  • Photogrammetry is considered a complementary data source if TLS produces insufficient data.
  • Measurements using fused point clouds produced reliable metric values for industrial applications.
Keywords
Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) UAV; SfM Photogrammetry Data Fusion Deformation Analysis Oil Tank Calibration
References
  1. I. Kadhim, F. M. Abed, J. M. Vilbig, V. Sagan, C. DeSilvey, Combining Remote Sensing Approaches for Detecting Marks of Archaeological and Demolished Constructions in Cahokia’s Grand Plaza, Southwestern Illinois, Remote. Sens., 15 (2023) 1057. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15041057
  2. L. Kovanič, M. Štroner, P. Blistan, R. Urban, R. Boczek, Combined ground-based and UAS SfM-MVS approach for determination of geometric parameters of the large-scale industrial facility – Case study, Measurement, 216 (2023) 112994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.112994
  3. A. S. Jaber, F. M. Abed, Revealing the potentials of 3D modelling techniques; a comparison study towards data fusion from hybrid sensors, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., 737, 2020, 012230. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/737/1/012230
  4. G. Lenda, U. Marmol, Integration of high-precision UAV laser scanning and terrestrial scanning measurements for determining the shape of a water tower, Measurement, 218 (2023) 113178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113178
  5. L. Koranic, P. Blistan, R. Urban, M. Stronger, K. Pukanská , K. Bartoš , J. Palková, Analytical determination of geometric parameters of the rotary kiln by novel approach of tls point cloud segmentation, Appl. Sci., 10 (2020) 7652. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217652
  6. Y. Alshawabkeh, A. Baik, Y. Miky, Integration of Laser Scanner and Photogrammetry for Heritage BIM Enhancement, ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 10 (2021) 316. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10050316
  7. G. Kafataris, D. Skarlatos, M. Vlachos, Fusion of Direct Georeferenced Aerial Drone with Terrestrial Laser Scanner Data the Case of the Roman Baths of Amathus, Cyprus, ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., X-1/W1-2023 (2023)1057–1064. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-1-W1-2023-1057-2023
  8. A. Capolupo, A. Maltese, M. Saponaro, D. Costantino, Integration of terrestrial laser scanning and UAV-SFM technique to generate a detailed 3D textured model of a heritage building, 11534 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2574034
  9. L. Kovanič, P. Peťovský, B. Topitzer, P. Blišťan, Spatial Analysis of Point Clouds Obtained by SfM Photogrammetry and the TLS Method—Study in Quarry Environment, Land, 13 (2024) 614. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13050614
  10. J. Siwiec, G. Lenda, Integration of terrestrial laser scanning and structure from motion for the assessment of industrial chimney geometry, Measurement, 199 (2022) 111404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111404
  11. J. Li, Y. Peng, Z. Tang, Z. Li, Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Railway Bridges Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle–Terrestrial Laser Scanner Point Cloud Fusion, Buildings, 13 (2023) 2841. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13112841
  12. P. Budzianowski, P. Tysiac, Combined close range photogrammetry and terrestrial laser scanning for ship hull modelling, Geosciences, 9 (2019) 242. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9050242
  13. M. Guo, X. Tang, Y. Zhao, Y. Liu, Z. Chen, L. Zhu, K. Guo, Monitoring Scheme of Liquified Natural Gas External Tank Using Air–Space–Land Integration Multisource Remote Sensing, Sens. Mater., 36 (2024) 373–392. https://doi.org/10.18494/SAM4603
  14. A. Soni, S. Robson, B. Gleeson, Structural monitoring for the rail industry using conventional survey, laser scanning and photogrammetry, Appl. Geomat., 7 (2015) 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-015-0156-1
  15. A. Z. Khalaf, A. S. J. Al-Saedi, Assessment of Structure with Analytical Digital Close Range Photogrammetry, Eng. Technol. J., 34 (2016) 2140–2151. http://dx.doi.org/10.30684/etj.34.11A.18
  16. “Leica TS09 Plus.” [Online]. Available: https://www.sccssurvey.co.uk/leica-flexline-ts09plus-total-station.html
  17. “CHCNAV i50 GNSS.” [Online]. Available: https://chcnav.com/uploads/i50_DS_EN.pdf
  18. Leica ScanStation C40.” [Online]. Available: https://leica-geosystems.com/products/laser-scanners/scanners/leica-scanstation-p40--p30
  19. “DJI Phantom 4 Pro.” [Online]. Available: https://www.dji.com/sk/phantom-4-pro
  20. R. M. Ridha, I. A. Alwan, H. S. Ismael, Accuracy assessment of UAV automated 3D city model for urban planning, AIP Conf. Proc., 2793, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0162664
  21. R. M. Ridha, I. A. Alwan, H. S. Ismael, Accuracy assessment of 3D model reconstructed from UAV images by the distribution of the ground control points (GCPs), AIP Conf. Proc., 3105, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0212203
  22. A. M. Noori, A. S. J. Al-Saedi, F. M. Abed, Optimizing Application of UAV-Based SfM Photogrammetric 3D Mapping in Urban Areas, J. Sci., 65 (2024) 2958–2975. https://doi.org/10.24996/ijs.2024.65.5.46
  23. A. Z. Khalaf, N. S. Mohammed, F. S. A. Al-hasoon, Accuracy Assessment of Analytical Orientation Process in Close range Photogrammetry, Eng. Technol. J., 34 (2016) 2739–2753. https://doi.org/10.30684/etj.34.14A.17
  24. A. H. Hadi, A. Z. Khalaf, Accuracy Assessment of Establishing 3D Real Scale Model in Close-Range Photogrammetry with Digital Camera, Eng. Technol. J., 40 (2022) 1492-1509. http://dx.doi.org/10.30684/etj.2022.132233.1097
  25. Leica Cyclone.” [Online]. Available: https://leica-geosystems.com/products/laser-scanners/software/leica-cyclone
  26. W. Moussa, K. Wenzel, M. Rothermel, M. Abdel-Wahab, D. Fritsch, Complementing TLS Point Clouds by Dense Image Matching, Int. J. Heritage in the Digital Era, 2 (2013) 453-470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1260/2047-4970.2.3.453
  27. Agisoft Metashape”, [Online]. Available: https://www.agisoft.com/features/professional-edition/
  28. Reality Capture.” [Online]. Available: https://www.capturingreality.com/
  29. CloudCompare.” [Online]. Available: https://www.danielgm.net/cc/
  30. A. S. J. Al-Saedi, F. M. Abed, I. A. Alwan, Geometric Quality Analysis of Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data for Industrial Usage, IIUM Eng. J., 25 (2024) 148–166. http://dx.doi.org/10.31436/iiumej.v25i2.3211
  31. Leica Cyclone.” [Online]. Available: https://leica-geosystems.com/products/laser-scanners/software/leica-cyclone/ leica-cyclone-3dr
Statistics
Article View: 579
PDF Download: 148


Journal Management System. Powered by iJournalPro.com