Danha, L., Rafeeq, R. (2025). The Shear Bond Strength of the Sapphire Bracket Bonded to Composite Restoration Using Different Bonding Agents. , 25(1), 80-94. doi: 10.33899/rdenj.2023.141316.1211
Luma Salim Danha; Reem Atta Rafeeq. "The Shear Bond Strength of the Sapphire Bracket Bonded to Composite Restoration Using Different Bonding Agents". , 25, 1, 2025, 80-94. doi: 10.33899/rdenj.2023.141316.1211
Danha, L., Rafeeq, R. (2025). 'The Shear Bond Strength of the Sapphire Bracket Bonded to Composite Restoration Using Different Bonding Agents', , 25(1), pp. 80-94. doi: 10.33899/rdenj.2023.141316.1211
Danha, L., Rafeeq, R. The Shear Bond Strength of the Sapphire Bracket Bonded to Composite Restoration Using Different Bonding Agents. , 2025; 25(1): 80-94. doi: 10.33899/rdenj.2023.141316.1211

The Shear Bond Strength of the Sapphire Bracket Bonded to Composite Restoration Using Different Bonding Agents

Al-Rafidain Dental Journal
Article 6, Volume 25, Issue 1, March 2025, Pages 80-94    PDF (769.53 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.33899/rdenj.2023.141316.1211
Authors
Luma Salim Danha* ; Reem Atta Rafeeq
College of Dentistry / Baghdad University, Baghdad, Iraq
Abstract
Aims: This study aimed to determine the most effective bonding system of sapphire brackets bonded to composite restoration. Materials and Method: Thirty composite discs (3M Filtek™ Z250) were stored in deionized water for nine days then conditioned with 37% phosphoric acid and divided into three groups based on the bonding agent: group (A) conventional bonding agent (Transbond XT™), group (B) Scotchbond™ and group (C) Assure Plus® were used, then the conventional adhesive (Transbond XT™) was applied to the base of sapphire brackets then bonded to composite discs. After bonding the composite discs, they were thermocycled for 5000 cycles, the shear bond strength (SBS) was measured, and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) was determined. Results: One-way ANOVA revealed no significant difference, although Assure Plus and Scotchbond showed higher SBS than Transbond, and the Kruskal-Wallis test revealed no significant difference in the ARI scores between the groups. Conclusion: All bonding agents produced more than the clinically acceptable shear bond strength (SBS), and all groups caused composite restoration surface fracture, indicating high SBS.
Keywords
Orthodontics; shear bond; Assure Plus; universal bonding agent; aged composite
Supplementary Files
References
  1. Ebert, T., Elsner, L., Hirschfelder, U. and Hanke, S., 2016. Shear bond strength of brackets on restorative materials. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, 77(2), pp.73-84.
  2. Bayram, M., Yeşilyurt, C., Kuşgöz, A., Ülker, M. and Nur, M., 2011. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to aged resin composite surfaces: effect of surface conditioning. The European Journal of Orthodontics, 33(2), pp.174-179.
  3. Viwattanatipa, N., Jermwiwatkul, W., Chintavalakorn, R. and Nanthavanich, N. 2010. The effect of different surface preparation techniques on the survival probabilities of orthodontic brackets bonded to nanofill composite resin. Journal of Orthodontics, 37(3) 162–173.
  4. Staxrud, F. and Dahl, J.E., 2011. Role of bonding agents in the repair of composite resin restorations. European journal of oral sciences, 119(4), pp.316-322.
  5. Ahrari, F., Heravi, F. and Hosseini, M., 2013. CO2 laser conditioning of porcelain surfaces for bonding metal orthodontic brackets. Lasers in medical science, 28(4), pp.1091-1097.
  6. Eslamian, L., Borzabadi-Farahani, A., Mousavi, N. and Ghasemi, A., 2011. The effects of various surface treatments on the shear bond strengths of stainless-steel brackets to artificially-aged composite restorations. Australian orthodontic journal, 27(1), pp.28-32.
  7. Lai, P.Y., Woods, M.G. and Tyas, M.J., 1999. Bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to restorative resin composite surfaces. Australian Orthodontic Journal, 15(4), pp.235-245.
  8. Marchesi, G., Frassetto, A., Mazzoni, A., Apolonio, F., Diolosa, M., Cadenaro, M., Di Lenarda, R., Pashley, D.H., Tay, F. and Breschi, L., 2014. Adhesive performance of a multi-mode adhesive system: 1-year in vitro study. Journal of dentistry, 42(5), pp.603-612.
  9. Toodehzaeim, M.H., Haerian, A., Safari, I. and Arjmandi, R., 2017. The effect of assure plus resin on the shear bond strength of metal brackets bonded to enamel and surface of porcelain and amalgam restorations. Bioscience Biotechnology Research Communications, 10(2) 82–87.
  10. Goracci, C., Özcan, M., Franchi, L., Di Bello, G., Louca, C. and Vichi, A., 2019. Bracket bonding to polymethylmethacrylate-based materials for computer-aided design/manufacture of temporary restorations: Influence of mechanical treatment and chemical treatment with universal adhesives. The korean journal of orthodontics, 49(6), pp.404-412.
  11. Buyukcavus, E., Ugurlu, M. and Buyukcavus, M.H., 2022. Shear bond strength of orthodontic molar tubes to composite restoration bonded with particular adhesives after different surface pre‐treatments. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research.
  12. Hellak, A., Ebeling, J., Schauseil, M., Stein, S., Roggendorf, M. and Korbmacher-Steiner, H., 2016. Shear Bond Strength of Three Orthodontic Bonding Systems on Enamel and Restorative Materials. BioMed Research International.
  13. Kadhom ZM. In Vitro Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Sapphire Brackets after Dental Bleaching. J Bagh Coll Dent [Internet]. 2016 Mar. 15 [cited 2022 Sep. 21];28(1):158-63
  14. Pickett, K.L., Lionel Sadowsky, P., Jacobson, A. and Lacefield, W., 2001. Orthodontic in vivo bond strength: comparison with in vitro results. The Angle Orthodontist, 71(2), 141-148.
  15. Algera, T.J., Kleverlaan, C.J., Prahl-Andersen, B. and Feilzer, A.J., 2008. The influence of dynamic fatigue loading on the separate components of the bracket-cement-enamel system. American Journal of Dentistry, 21(4), pp.239-243.
  16. Albaladejo, A., Montero, J., Gómez de Diego, R. and López-Valverde, A., 2011. Effect of adhesive application prior to bracket bonding with flowable composites. The Angle orthodontist, 81(4), pp.716-720.
  17. Junior, S.A.R., Ferracane, J.L. and Della Bona, Á., 2009. Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials. Dental Materials, 25(4), pp.442-451.
  18. Tahmasbi, S., Badiee, M. and Modarresi, M., 2019. Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets to Composite Restorations Using Universal Adhesive. Journal of Dentistry (Shiraz, Iran), 20(2) 75– 82.
  19. Elias, S., Rashed, M., Aldoski, N. and Abdulmajeed, F., 2017. Shear-bond strength of orthodontic brackets to nano-hybrid composite resin using different protocols. Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences, 16(9) 64–69.
  20. Bishara, S.E., Ostby, A.W., Laffoon, J. and Warren, J.J., 2008. Enamel cracks and ceramic bracket failure during debonding in vitro. The Angle Orthodontist, 78(6), pp.1078-1083.
  21. Malkoç, S., Uysal, T., Üşümez, S., İşman, E. and Baysal, A., 2010. In-vitro assessment of temperature rise in the pulp during orthodontic bonding. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 137(3), pp.379-383.
  22. Sodagar, A., Bahador, A., Jalali, Y.F., Gorjizadeh, F. and Baghaeian, P., 2016. Effect of chitosan nanoparticles incorporation on antibacterial properties and shear bond strength of dental composite used in orthodontics. Iran J Ortho.
  23. Valizadeh, S., Alimohammadi, G., Nik, T.H., Etemadi, A. and Tanbakuchi, B., 2020. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic metal brackets to aged composite using a self-adhesive composite: Effect of surface conditioning and different bonding agents. International Orthodontics, 18(3), pp.528-537.
  24. Cevik, P., Eraslan, O., Eser, K. and Tekeli, S., 2018. Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to surface-treated feldspathic porcelain after thermocycling. The International Journal of Artificial Organs, 41(3), pp.160-167.
  25. Xu, Z., Li, J., Fan, X. and Huang, X., 2018. Bonding strength of orthodontic brackets on porcelain surfaces etched by Er: YAG laser. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery, 36(11), pp.601-607.
  26. Årtun, J. and Bergland, S., 1984. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. American Journal of Orthodontics, 85(4) 333–340.
  27. Brunthaler, A., König, F., Lucas, T., Sperr, W. and Schedle, A., 2003. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a review. Clinical oral investigations, 7(2), 63-70.
  28. Karamouzos, A., Athanasiou, A.E. and Papadopoulos, M.A., 1997. Clinical characteristics and properties of ceramic brackets: a comprehensive review. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 112(1), pp.34-40.
  29. Costa, T.R.F., Ferreira, S.Q., Klein-Júnior, C.A., Loguercio, A.D. and Reis, A., 2010. Durability of surface treatments and intermediate agents used for repair of a polished composite. Operative Dentistry, 35(2) 231–237.
  30. Koin PJ, Kilislioglu A, Zhou M, Drummond JL, Hanley L, 2008. Analysis of the degradation of a model dental composite. J Dent Res, 87(7), pp. 661-665.
  31. Kitasako, Y., Burrow, M.F., Nikaido, T. and Tagami, J., 2000. The influence of storage solution on dentin bond durability of resin cement. Dental Materials, 16(1), pp.1-6.
  32. Hatf, A.D. and AL-Khatieeb, M.M., 2020. Effect of ageing media on shear bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets bonded with different adhesive systems (A comparative in-vitro study). Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry, 32(4), pp.5-11.).
  33. Reynolds, I.R., 1975. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. British journal of orthodontics, 2(3), pp.171-178.
  34. , V., Aghabaigi, N. and Tabatabaei, F.S., 2011. An in vitro assessment of the effects of three surface treatments on repair bond strength of aged composites. Operative dentistry, 36(6), pp.608-617.
  35. Zaidan SM, Rafeeq RA. Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Three Luting Materials Used in Band and Loop Space Maintainer Cementation: An In Vitro Study. Dental Hypotheses. 2022 Oct 1;13(4):136.
  36. Park, S.B., Son, W.S., Ko, C.C., García-Godoy, F., Park, M.G., Kim, H. Il and Kwon, Y.H., 2009. Influence of flowable resins on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Dental Materials Journal, 28(6) 730–734.
  37. Papacchini, F., Magni, E., Radovic, I., Mazzitelli, C., Monticelli, F., Goracci, C., Polimeni, A. and Ferrari, M., 2007. Effect of intermediate agents and pre-heating of repairing resin on composite-repair bonds. Operative dentistry, 32(4), pp.363-371.
  38. Summitt, J.B. ed., 2006. Fundamentals of operative dentistry: a contemporary approach. Quintessence Publishing Company.
  39. Hardous R., Bouserhal J. and Essam O., 2019. Evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic molar tubes bonded using hydrophilic primers: An in vitro study. International Orthodontics; 17: 461–468.
  40. Farhadifard, H., Rezaei-Soufi, L., Farhadian, M. and Shokouhi, P., 2020. Effect of different surface treatments on shear bond strength of ceramic brackets to old composite. Biomaterials Research, 24(1), pp.1-7.
  41. Degrazia, F.W., Leitune, V.C.B., Garcia, I.M., Arthur, R.A., Samuel, S.M.W. and Collares, F.M., 2016. Effect of silver nanoparticles on the physicochemical and antimicrobial properties of an orthodontic adhesive. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 24, pp.404-410.
  42. Graber, T.M., Vanarsdall Jr, R.L. and Vig, K.W., 2006. Orthodontics. Current principles & techniques,(2005). European journal of orthodontics, 28, p.197.
  43. Ibrahim AI, Al-Hasani NR, Thompson VP, Deb S. In vitro bond strengths post thermal and fatigue load cycling of sapphire brackets bonded with self-etch primer and evaluation of enamel damage. Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry. 2020 Jan;12(1):e22.
  44. Tse, M., 2012. The Effect of Surface Treatments and Bonding Agents on the Shear Bond Strengths of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded to Aged Composite Resin Restorations (Master dissertation, Western University).
 

 

Statistics
Article View: 310
PDF Download: 238


Journal Management System. Powered by iJournalPro.com