Alwan, N., Al-Askary, R. (2025). Evaluation of Bond Strength Between Various Types of Fiber Posts and Resin Cements: An In Vitro Comparative Study. , 25(1), 192-211. doi: 10.33899/rdenj.2023.142545.1220
Nada J. Alwan; Raghad A Al-Askary. "Evaluation of Bond Strength Between Various Types of Fiber Posts and Resin Cements: An In Vitro Comparative Study". , 25, 1, 2025, 192-211. doi: 10.33899/rdenj.2023.142545.1220
Alwan, N., Al-Askary, R. (2025). 'Evaluation of Bond Strength Between Various Types of Fiber Posts and Resin Cements: An In Vitro Comparative Study', , 25(1), pp. 192-211. doi: 10.33899/rdenj.2023.142545.1220
Alwan, N., Al-Askary, R. Evaluation of Bond Strength Between Various Types of Fiber Posts and Resin Cements: An In Vitro Comparative Study. , 2025; 25(1): 192-211. doi: 10.33899/rdenj.2023.142545.1220

Evaluation of Bond Strength Between Various Types of Fiber Posts and Resin Cements: An In Vitro Comparative Study

Al-Rafidain Dental Journal
Article 15, Volume 25, Issue 1, March 2025, Pages 192-211    PDF (788.66 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.33899/rdenj.2023.142545.1220
Authors
Nada J. Alwan* ; Raghad A Al-Askary*
Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Mosul, Iraq
Abstract
Abstract: The current study aimed to compare the tensile bond strength (TBS) between different types of fiber posts and resin cement. Materials and methods: Sixty-three human lower premolars with similar root dimensions were randomly assigned to three groups, each consisting of 21 teeth belonging to a specific type of fiber post. The teeth were prepared by removing the coronal portion and mounted in acrylic blocks, leaving 2mm of the coronal tooth exposed. Endodontic therapy and post-space preparation were performed on the root canals of all specimens. The text describes a study where groups were divided into subgroups based on the type of resin cement used for luting fiber posts. Each subgroup consisted of 7 teeth. The bond strength between the fiber post and resin cement was measured using a universal testing machine, and the mode of failure was analyzed using a stereomicroscope. Results: The results of the study indicated significant differences among the groups and showed that the group using quartz fiber posts and RelyX U200 resin cement had the highest mean TBS (387.43±6.924), while the group using glass fiber posts and TOTAL C-RAM resin cement had the lowest mean TBS (176.29±3.039). Conclusion: The type of fiber post used in conjunction with a specific luting agent has an impact on the bond strength between the post and the resin cement. The study suggests that higher bond values can be achieved when using quartz fiber posts luted with RelyX U-200 cement. However, it is important to note that these findings are based on the limitations of the study.
Keywords
fiberpost,,; ,،tensile strength,,; ,،resin cement
Supplementary Files
References
  1. Alnaqbi IOM, Elbishari H, Elsubeihi  Effect of Fiber Post-Resin Matrix Composition on Bond Strength of Post-Cement Interface. Int J Dent. 2018; 4751627
  2. Silva E, Pereira C, Limeira F, Affonso P, Moreira A, and Magalhães C. Bond strength according to the moment of fiber post cutting fixed with self-adhesive cement to the root dentin. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021;13(1): 56-60.
  3. Schwartz S, and Robbins J. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod. 2004;0(5): 289-301.
  4. Kumar B, and Kumar R. Comparative evaluation of push out bond strength of fiber post using one self-etch resin cement and two self-adhesive resin cements - an in-vitro study. J Evolution Med Dent Sci. 2021;33(10):2712-2716.
  5. Abo El-Ela O.A, Atta O.A, and El-Mowafy O. Fracture resistance of anterior teeth restored with a novel non metallic post. JCDA. 2008;74(5): 441.
  6. Vidhya S, Chandrasekar C, and Narayanan L. A comparative evaluation of fracture r esistance and penetration of bonding resin in to three different fiber reinforced posts using confocal microscope. Inter J Dent Sci. 2009;9(1): 1-10.
  7. Kim J, Park S, Park J, and Jung Y . Influence of post types and sizes on fracture resistance in the immature tooth model. JKACD. 2010;35(4): 257-266.
  8. Otis L L, Everett M J, Sathyam U S, and Colston J B. Optical coherence tomography: a new imaging technology for dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000; 131(4): 511-514.
  9. Ricardo S, Marissa C, Usman M, Suprastiwi E, Yusuf  RM, and Meidyawati R. Comparison of three bioceramic sealers in terms of dentinal sealing ability in the root canal. Int J Appl Pharma. 2020;12(2):4-7.
  10. Kumar M, Sequeira P S, and Bhat G K. Sterilization of extracted human teeth for educational use. Indian J Med Microbio. 2005;23(4):256-258.
  11. Ballullaya SV, Vinay V, Thumu J, Devalla S, Bollu IP, and Balla S. Stereomicroscopic dye leakage measurement of six different root canal sealers. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(6):65-68.
  12. Garg N, Garg A, Kang RS, Mann JS, Manchanda SK, Ahuja B. A comparison of apical seal produced by zinc oxide eugenol, Metapex, Ketac Endo and AH Plus root canal sealers. Endodont. 2014;26(2):252-258.
  13. Pedreira APR, D’alpino PHP, Pereira  PNR, Chaves  SB, Wang  L,  Hilgert  L, Garcia  FCP. Effects of the application techniques of self adhesive resin cements on the interfacial integrity and bond strength of fiber post to dentin. J Appl Oral Sci. 2016;24(5):437-446.
  14. ArRejaie A, Al-suliman SA, Aljohani  MO, Altamimi  HA, Alshwaimi  E, Al-Thobity  AM. Micro-computed tomography analysis of gap and void formation in different prefabricated fiber post cementation materials and techniques. Saudi Dent J. 2019;31(2):236-241.
  15. Moogi P, Sayyad A, Rathore V, Ghosh S, Ambalia S, Amin A. Comparative evaluation of marginal adaptation of two resin-based sealers: A scanning electron microscopic study. Endodont. 2020;32(3):137-141.
  16. Sahebi S, Sobhnamayan F, Moazami F, Naseri M. Assessment of sodium thiosulfate neutralizing effect on micro-hardness of dentin treated with sodium hypochlorite. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):326-332.
  17. Webber M , Bernardon P, França F M, Amara F L, Basting R T, and Turssi C P. Oval versus circular-shaped root canals: bond strength reached with varying post techniques. Braz Dent J. 2018; 29(4): 335-341.
  18. Abreu RT, Monteiro JB, Abu-Hasna  A, Santos T, Dal Piva  AM, Cesar  RP, Torres  C,  Carvalho  CA. Bond strength of cemented fiber posts to teeth with simulated internal root resorption. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020;12(3):277-284.
  19. Chakmakchi M, Rasheed R,  Suliman  R. In Vitro Comparative assessment of facture resistance of roots restored with Everstick fiber reinforced composite post. J Oral Dent Res. 2015;2(1):43-50.
  20. Yahya, E. Tensile Strength of Core Build up Material to Glass Fiber Post with Different Surface Treatment. Al-Rafidain Dent J, 2017; 17(1): 1-11. 
  21. Bonfante G, Kaizer OB, Pegoraro LF, do Valle AL. Tensile bond strength of glass fiber posts luted with different cements. Braz Oral Res. 2007; 21(2):159-164.
  22. Le Bell AM, Tanner J, Lassila LV, Kangasniemi I, Vallittu P. Bonding of composite resin luting cement to fiber-reinforced composite root canal posts. J Adhes Dent. 2004;6(4):319-25. 
  23. Mannocci F, Machmouridou E, Watson T F,  Sauro S. Microtensile bond strength of resin-post interfaces created with interpenetrating polymer network posts or cross-linked posts. Medicina Oral, Patolog´ıa Oral y Cirug´ıa Bucal.2008; 13(11):745–752.
  24. Kececi AD, Ureyen Kaya B, Adanir N. Micro push-out bond strengths of four fiber-reinforced composite post systems and 2 luting materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;105(1):121-8.
  25. Ubaldini ALM, Benetti AR, Sato F, Pascotto RC, Medina Neto A, Baesso ML, Peutzfeldt A. Challenges in luting fibre posts: Adhesion to the post and to the dentine. Dent Mater. 2018;34(7):1054-1062.
  26. Das AK, Muddugangadhar BC, Amarnath  GS, Garg  A, Kumar  U, Rao  TR. Comparative Evaluation of Push Out Bond Strength of a Fiber Post System using Four Different Resin Cements: An In-Vitro Study. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7(Suppl 1):62-72. 
  27. Amiri EM, Balouch F, Atri  F. Effect of Self-Adhesive and Separate Etch Adhesive Dual Cure Resin Cements on the Bond Strength of Fiber Post to Dentin at Different Parts of the Root. J Dent. 2017;14(3):153-158.
  28. Zicari F, Couthino E, De Munck J, Poitevin A, Scotti R, Naert I, et al. Bonding effectiveness and sealing ability of fiber-post bonding. Dent Mater. 2008; 24(7):967-77.
  29. Charton C, Falk V, Marchal P, Pla F, Colon P. Influence of Tg, viscosity and chemical structure of monomers on shrinkage stress in light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Dent Mater. 2007;23(11):1447-59.
  30. Monticelli F, Osorio R, Mazzitelli C, Ferrari M, Toledano M. Limited decalcification/diffusion of self adhesive cement into dentin. J Dent Res. 2008;87:974-9.
  31. Turp V, Sen D, Tuncelli B, Ozcan M. Adhesion of 10-MDP containing resin cements to dentin with and without the etch-and-rinse technique. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013;5(3):226-33.
Statistics
Article View: 223
PDF Download: 120


Journal Management System. Powered by iJournalPro.com