I. Al-jugifi, W., T. Mohammad, E. (2024). THE EFFECT OF COATING HATCHING EGGS WITH CHITOSAN AND SPRAYING WITH ACETIC ACID ON THE PRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE OF HATCHED CHICKS. , 22(2), 834-850. doi: 10.32649/ajas.2024.142118.1063
W. I. Al-jugifi; E. T. Mohammad. "THE EFFECT OF COATING HATCHING EGGS WITH CHITOSAN AND SPRAYING WITH ACETIC ACID ON THE PRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE OF HATCHED CHICKS". , 22, 2, 2024, 834-850. doi: 10.32649/ajas.2024.142118.1063
I. Al-jugifi, W., T. Mohammad, E. (2024). 'THE EFFECT OF COATING HATCHING EGGS WITH CHITOSAN AND SPRAYING WITH ACETIC ACID ON THE PRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE OF HATCHED CHICKS', , 22(2), pp. 834-850. doi: 10.32649/ajas.2024.142118.1063
I. Al-jugifi, W., T. Mohammad, E. THE EFFECT OF COATING HATCHING EGGS WITH CHITOSAN AND SPRAYING WITH ACETIC ACID ON THE PRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE OF HATCHED CHICKS. , 2024; 22(2): 834-850. doi: 10.32649/ajas.2024.142118.1063

THE EFFECT OF COATING HATCHING EGGS WITH CHITOSAN AND SPRAYING WITH ACETIC ACID ON THE PRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE OF HATCHED CHICKS

Anbar Journal of Agricultural Sciences
Volume 22, Issue 2, December 2024, Pages 834-850    PDF (657.74 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.32649/ajas.2024.142118.1063
Authors
W. I. Al-jugifi* ; E. T. Mohammad*
Department of animal production, College of Agriculture, University of Anbar, Ramadi, Iraq
Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate the coating of hatching eggs with chitosan and spraying with diluted acetic acid on the productive performance of hatched chicks from the mothers of Ross 308 broilers, and the study included two factors: two storage periods (4 days and 14 days) and egg packaging with chitosan before storage and spraying with acetic acid, as the coefficients T1 without addition, T2 spraying with acetic acid at 18 days of incubation, T3 packaging with chitosan before storage, T4 egg packaging at the age of 18 days of incubation and for two storage periods ( 4 and 14 days), each treatment included 60 eggs with four duplicates (15 eggs per duplicate), after hatching, the chicks were reared according to each treatment until the age of 35 days. The results showed that there were no significant differences of the experimental coefficients and their overlaps in the weekly body weight of the birds. While a significant superiority of the T3 treatment was found in the weight gain of birds within 35 days. A significant improvement of( P≤0.05) was found in the feed consumption rate and feed conversion coefficient of birds at a storage period of 4 compared to a storage period of 14 days. Also, a significant increase of (P≤0.05) was found in the food conversion coefficient in T2 and T4 compared to the rest of the experimental coefficients during 1-35 days of life. As for the growth rate , a moral superiority of (P≤0.05) was found in favor of the group of hatched chicks from stock eggs for 4 days compared to 14 days, and all transactions were morally superior (P≤0.05) compared to T4 at 18 days of storage, and T3 was morally superior (P≤0.05) at 14 days storage compared to the control group in the relative growth rate during 35 days, as for the economic indicator, the third transaction T3 was morally superior (P≤0.05) compared to the rest of the transactions 
Keywords
Chitosan; Hatching eggs Coating; Productive production of broiler
References
  1. Abdulateef, S., Saed, Z. J., Al-Bayar, M. A., Mustafa, R. D., Mohammed, N. A., Shawkat, S. S., and Mohammed, T. Th. (2024). Impact of the Light Colors on Embryonic Development, Hatchability, Chick Quality in Broiler Chicken. Tikrit Journal for Agricultural Sciences, 24(3): 37–49. https://doi.org/10.25130/tjas.24.3.4
  2. Al-Bayar, A. M., and H. Attallah, M. (2024). Effect Of Centrifugation And Addition Of Melatonin Hormone To Semen On Characteristics Of Seminal Plasma In Cooled Semen Of Iraqi Local Roosters. Anbar Journal Of Agricultural Sciences, 22(1): 517-527. https://doi.org/10.32649/ajas.2024.183750.
  3. Alaamery, L. F. N., and Aldhanki, Z. M. (2019). Impact of hatching systems and different storage periods on hatching parameters of broiler breeder eggs. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 388(1): p. 012029. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/388/1/012029.
  4. Al-Fayyad, H. A., and Naji, S. A., and Abdel-Hajo, N. N. (2011). Poultry Products Technology. The second edition, Directorate of the Ministry of Higher Education Printing Press. Baghdad.
  5. Al-Samarrai, E. K. I. (2012). The effect of pre-incubation and storage of hatching eggs on hatching characteristics, productive and physiological performance of broiler chickens. Master Thesis. College of Agriculture - Anbar Univ.
  6. Al-Samrai, E. K., and Tawfeeq, A. A. (2021). Effects of Egg Coverages on Storage and Pre-incubation Periods in Broiler Breeder Eggs. Journal of World's Poultry Research, 11(4): 468-474. https://dx.doi.org/10.36380/jwpr.2021.55.
  7. Al-Zubaidi, S. S. A. (1986). Poultry management. First edition, Basra University Press.
  8. Bhale, S., No, H. K., Prinyawiwatkul, W., Farr, A. J., Nadarajah, K., and Meyers, S. P. (2003). Chitosan coating improves shelf life of eggs. Journal of food science, 68(7): 2378-2383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2003.tb05776.x.
  9. Butcher, G. (2004). Techniques for embryo-diagnosis and development of the chicken embryo. In ASA Conference.
  10. Caner, C. (2005). The effect of edible eggshell coatings on egg quality and consumer perception. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 85(11): 1897-1902. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2185.
  11. Choi, C., Nam, J. P., and Nah, J. W. (2016). Application of chitosan and chitosan derivatives as biomaterials. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 33: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2015.10.028.
  12. Duncan, D. B. (1955). Multiple range and multiple F tests. biometrics, 11(1): 1-42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478.
  13. Eke, M. O., Olaitan, N. I., and Ochefu, J. H. (2013). Effect of storage conditions on the quality attributes of shell (table) eggs. Nigerian Food Journal, 31(2): 18-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0189-7241(15)30072-2.
  14. Fasenko, G. M. (2007). Egg storage and the embryo. Poultry science, 86(5): 1020-1024. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.5.1020.
  15. Gondwe, T. N. P., and Wollny, C. B. A. (2005). Evaluation of the growth potential of local chickens in Malawi. International Journal of Poultry Science, 4(2).
  16. Ibrahim, M. S. M. B. M. (2018). relationship of pre-incubation and storage period of hatching eggs with subsequent productive performance of broiler chicks. iraqi poultry sciences journal, 12(1): 48-58.
  17. Kim, S. H., No, H. K., and Prinyawiwatkul, W. (2007). Effect of molecular weight, type of chitosan, and chitosan solution pH on the shelf‐life and quality of coated eggs. Journal of food science, 72(1): 44-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00233.x.
  18. King’Ori, A. M. (2011). Review of the factors that influence egg fertility and hatchability in poultry. International Journal of poultry science, 10(6): 483-492.
  19. Mohammed, T., T. H., & H. Hamad, E. (2024). Effect of Adding Natural Zeolite And Vitamin E To Laying Hans Diets On Some Productive Traits During The Summer Season. Anbar Journal Of Agricultural Sciences, 22(1), 501–516. https://doi.org/10.32649/ajas.2024.183746.
  20. Nasri, H., van Den Brand, H., Najjar, T., and Bouzouaia, M. (2020). Egg storage and breeder age impact on egg quality and embryo development. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 104(1): 257-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13240.
  21. Nowaczewski, S., Babuszkiewicz, M., Szablewski, T., Stuper-Szablewska, K., Cegielska-Radziejewska, R., Kaczmarek, S., ... and Hejdysz, M. (2022). Effect of weight and storage time of broiler breeders’ eggs on morphology and biochemical features of eggs, embryogenesis, hatchability, and chick quality. animal, 16(7): 100564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2022.100564.
  22. Suresh, P. V., Raj, K. R., Nidheesh, T., Pal, G. K., and Sakhare, P. Z. (2015). Application of chitosan for improvement of quality and shelf life of table eggs under tropical room conditions. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 52: 6345-6354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-1721-7.
  23. Van den Brand, H., Reijrink, I. A. M., Hoekstra, L. A., and Kemp, B. (2008). Storage of eggs in water affects internal egg quality, embryonic development, and hatchling quality. Poultry science, 87(11): 2350-2357. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00451.
Statistics
Article View: 1,091
PDF Download: 415


Journal Management System. Powered by iJournalPro.com